Home > Failed To > Scsi Command 0x2a

Scsi Command 0x2a

Contents

Next we will see actual failover sequence: 2012-04-29T13:18:19.747Z cpu9:4278)vmw_psp_fixed: psp_fixedSelectPathToActivateInt:479: Changing active path from vmhba0:C0:T2:L42 to vmhba1:C0:T1:L42 for device "naa.60050768018900725000000000000810". 2012-04-29T13:18:19.747Z cpu2:4786)WARNING: NMP: nmpDeviceAttemptFailover:599:Retry world failover device "naa.60050768018900725000000000000810" - issuing command Comments are closed. Re: Starange storage HBA problem Pushkin201110141 Dec 20, 2010 11:48 PM (in response to nicholas1982) In my case it's ESX 4.0 build 261974, not ESX4.1. This feature was introduced in vSphere 4.1 and improved in vSphere 5.0, and requires a storage array that supports VAAI. have a peek here

Act:EVAL2012-03-28T17:12:56.481Z cpu11:4107)WARNING: NMP: nmp_DeviceRequestFastDeviceProbe:237:NMP device "naa.60060480000190100554533033364445" state in doubt; requested fast path state update…2012-03-28T17:12:56.481Z cpu11:4107)ScsiDeviceIO: 2322: Cmd(0x4124003d4740) 0x16, CmdSN 0x23102 from world 0 to dev "naa.60060480000190100554533033364445" failed H:0x8 D:0x0 P:0x0 Possible esx-esxhost4.local-2012-04-30-14.37/var/run/log/vmkernel.1:2012-04-29T14:40:21.634Z cpu17:4113)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure:2084: SCSI cmd RESERVE failed on path vmhba1:C0:T1:L1, reservation state on device naa.600507680189007250000000000006d7 is unknown. All hosts are littered with the above failure messages, and with Emulex verbose logging we might be able to determine why different host errors statuses were returned, but that isn't important Need to determine why these events are being seen and how we can improve performance.The first step when troubleshooting this type of issue is to take a frame of reference that

Scsi Command 0x2a

How many ESXi accessing this volume? History of the issue General storage performance issue while experiencing timeouts and SCSI reservation issues (Timeout/conflict) on ESX 4.1 (VMware View) and ESX 5.0 environments. VMware.com Communities Search Search Home > Blogs > Support Insider Support Insider VMware Support News, Alerts, and Announcements Post navigation ← Hosts Unresponsive after Firmware Upgrade of IBM SVC My VMware We have to locate when the paths to one target dropped: 2012-04-29T13:18:19.684Z cpu10:4768)<3> rport-5:0-4: blocked FC remote port time out: saving binding 2012-04-29T13:18:19.685Z cpu2:4794)<3>lpfc820 0000:04:00.0: 0:(0):0203 Devloss timeout on WWPN 50:05:07:68:01:30:59:fd

However > we should not see temporary storage removal. > > Any advice how to further debug this issue. No prior reservation exists on the device. Alarm or BBU) 0x23 Item not found 0x24 LD drives are not within an enclosure 0x25 PD CLEAR operation is in progress 0x26 Unable to use SATA(SAS) drive to replace SAS(SATA) Scsi Sense Code Decoder esx-esxhost4.local-2012-04-30-14.37/var/run/log/vmkernel.1:2012-04-29T14:39:01.633Z cpu11:4107)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure:2084: SCSI cmd RESERVE failed on path vmhba1:C0:T1:L3, reservation state on device naa.60050768018900725000000000000721 is unknown.

This means that the other two paths to this LUN can still be used for access. I would first and foremost check the network logs for connectivity issues. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and Command may fail 5. https://kb.vmware.com/kb/1029039 Nathan Small April 16, 2012 at 10:36 am Hi Anthony, You may seen these messages in your environment from time to time and all it really means is that it took

Path vmhba2:C0:T0:L0 is active again.. Nmp_resetdevicelogthrottling Please don't fill out this field. Here is the issue observed on one of the ESX 4.1 host:ESXi 4.1:Mar 28 17:12:58 vmkernel: 34:11:37:08.013 cpu13:4262)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure: SCSI cmd RESERVE failed on path vmhba1:C0:T2:L1, reservation state on device naa.60060480000190100554533032324644 Screenshot instructions: Windows Mac Red Hat Linux Ubuntu Click URL instructions: Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here → (This may not be possible with some types of

Valid Sense Data: 0xe 0x1d 0x0

There is however > change in both what IET reports and how ESX responds. > > IET messages: > 1) > Jun 1 13:17:22 * kernel: [ 8219.976051] iscsi_trgt: Abort > https://kb.vmware.com/kb/2011218 Oct 14 06:01:07 esx2 vmkernel: 65:11:49:36.514 cpu13:4135)WARNING: FS3: 7030: Reservation error: Timeout This morning I solved the problem by restarting the physical node from IBM AMM.After the restart there were no Scsi Command 0x2a esx-esxhost3.local-2012-04-30-09.49/var/run/log/vmkernel.log:2012-04-29T09:40:41.000Z cpu0:4120)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure:2084: SCSI cmd RESERVE failed on path vmhba0:C0:T0:L14, reservation state on device naa.6005076801890072500000000000083b is unknown. Nmp_throttlelogfordevice Please type your message and try again. 8 Replies Latest reply: Jan 2, 2011 11:35 PM by monkalnakor Starange storage HBA problem monkalnakor Oct 18, 2010 12:12 AM Hi,I have a

Next we see Reservation errors: 2012-04-29T14:38:28.606Z cpu14:4133)WARNING: FS3: 1835: Reservation error: Timeout 2012-04-29T14:38:28.807Z cpu22:4131)WARNING: FS3: 1835: Reservation error: IO was aborted Then eventually we see the SATP for the IBM SVC http://itivityglobal.com/failed-to/failed-to-execute-command-usr-openv-netbackup-bin-bptm.html W. Februar 2015 um 10:31 Uhr geändert. Not only is this a command failure, but we specifically state that the reservation state of a LUN is “unknown”. Nmp_throttlelogfordevice:3298

Show 8 replies 1. This behavior eventually leads to the following: 2012-04-29T14:38:17.866Z cpu17:134520)ScsiDeviceIO: 2305: Cmd(0x412440df52c0) 0x16, CmdSN 0x207323 to dev "naa.6005076801890072500000000000065e" failed H:0x2 D:0x0 P:0x0 Possible sense data: 0x0 0x0 0x0. 2012-04-29T14:38:17.866Z cpu17:134520)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure:2084: SCSI Let's start by looking at the firmware update sequence, and to determine when it began and finished. Check This Out To start, let's take a closer look at the LUNs reporting the issue in both environments:ESX 4.1:Error message:Mar 28 17:12:58 vmkernel: 34:11:37:08.013 cpu13:4262)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure: SCSI cmd RESERVE failed on path vmhba1:C0:T2:L1,

You can not post a blank message. Scsideviceio: 2369 What HBA's are you using? View entire thread SourceForge About Site Status @sfnet_ops Powered by Apache Allura™ Find and Develop Software Create a Project Software Directory Top Downloaded Projects Community Blog @sourceforge Resources Help Site Documentation

Jetzt Thomas-Krenn Newsletter abonnieren Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 23.

Search / Translate Subscribe & Follow All topics NSX Alerts @VMwareCares Tweets by @VMwareCares Resources Knowledge Base KB Digest VMware KBTV Whitepapers Technical Papers Documentation Categories Alerts Announcements Cloud Consumer Desktop Not starting I/O from device. This shows us that more than LUN 1, 2, and 14 reported the reservation state unknown errors, though LUNs 1, 2, and 14 were the only LUNs that had a SCSI-2 Nmp_throttlelogfordevice:2458 This means that commands could have been queued up on the SVC side while waiting for login to complete and then flush those commands through, which may have explained the behavior

This will happen when a SCSI RESERVE command is sent, doesn't not complete to the target due to timeout, and then abort sent for the SCSI reserve doesn't complete either due esx-esxhost2.local-2012-04-30-14.52/var/run/log/vmkernel.1:2012-04-29T14:39:38.866Z cpu20:1675016)NMP: nmp_PathDetermineFailure:2084: SCSI cmd RESERVE failed on path vmhba0:C0:T2:L17, reservation state on device naa.6005076801890072500000000000065e is unknown. So there you go VMware do have any method of releasing the VMDK lock on the storage and restarting the VM on another host in the event of total HBA failure http://itivityglobal.com/failed-to/failed-to-execute-command-line-perl-perltidy.html Those problems do not manifest when > > iozone is run from RHE5 hosted in this environment, however it is likely that > > underlying issue is also present there >

The reason why one LUN had the reserve left on it while another did not is purely due to whatever operation a host was doing when it attempted to grab the