Home > Failed To > Failed To Find Sysfs Mount Point

Failed To Find Sysfs Mount Point

Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Top gerald_clark Posts: 10595 Joined: 2005/08/05 15:19:54 Location: Northern Illinois, USA Re: Mount local filesystem: FAILED Quote Postby gerald_clark » 2009/06/05 15:19:02 Your fstab:# cat /etc/fstab/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1LABEL=/boot For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. http://itivityglobal.com/failed-to/tomcat-failed-to-initialize-end-point-associated-with-protocolhandler.html

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. Last edited by Nogitsune; 10-15-2014 at 04:48 AM. The complaint about the checksum error however, I believe would result from the version 1.2 metadata having corrupted the portion of the original version 0.9 RAID array. Any help would be appreciated!

But here is least a possiblity... /dev/vg_willowtree/lv_root / ext4 defaults 1 2 /dev/mapper/vg_pete-lv_root / ext4 defaults 1 1It shouldn't make it any worse to try it. One more detail about the situation: The original raid disk 1 has not had it's metadata corrupted, and as far as I can tell has never been part of any recreation I followedhttp://www.opvizor.com/blog/vmware-vcenter-server-appliance-vcsa-filesystem-is-damaged/ to get out to a BASH prompt, but the filesystems that I was getting errors for were on LVM volume groups. All Rights Reserved.

desertrat6th March 2010, 07:43 PMThis is what mine says. Short version first, to help you decide if this is relevant, or if you might be able to offer some advice: The RAID has lost some of it's data around 4k I think the Fedora Gods must be punishing me as I had recently downloaded an image for another distro, but was only trying to install it to usb and play with Everything was working great with my FC12 box.

Thanks in advance. Get them in wrong order, and the command will destroy everything on your raid disk forever, without warning, without asking anything. It appears the volume group information is saved in 'sequences'. https://forge.univention.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18520 With the latest, fully intact metadata from the volume group, it should be possible to restore the whole storage structure.

PopcornKing6th March 2010, 07:58 PMUnfortunately since my filesystem wont mount, it doesnt seem to be writing logs to disk. Unfortunately my screwup with first arranging 4 of the disks together in wrong order (thereby letting the RAID system run reconstruction on shuffled array) already cost me the root partition, and I took 200M worth of raw data from the start of each of the partitions that construct the md4 array, into file, and gave a cursory look at them. Largely, I think the root partition is a lost case.

using 'bs' argument to increase the block size can speed up things a lot. https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-806467-start-0.html The old hindsight is 20-20 thing. .../etc/fstabCode: Select allswap swap defaults 0 0
...Should beCode: Select all/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 Now updating webmin-virtual-server ..

Installing package(s) with command apt-get -y install webmin-virtual-server ..

Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
The following From this point on, I was essentially going along the two sets of instructions I came across on the net: http://blog.adamsbros.org/2009/05/30...thout-backups/ Code: # pvcreate -ff -u ywNthS-AqjP-77mI-OXCF-j1R1-pQOa-pLvObm --restorefile /root/raid_data/meta14.txt /dev/md4 #

It depends on your partition setup, and even a small deviation could be catastrophic. 'if' parameter is the input file handle, in this case the block device of your original raid his comment is here The time now is 05:48 AM. And when I went to look for those devices, they weren't showing up under /dev/mapper. The 'of' parameter is the output file handle, in this case the block device of your new, empty hard drive, such as /dev/sda or /dev/sdc.

Post Reply Print view Search Advanced search 8 posts • Page 1 of 1 drbillc Posts: 74 Joined: 2009/05/30 14:02:46 Location: MD Mount local filesystem: FAILED Quote Postby drbillc » 2009/06/04 Home Recovering from vCenter Appliance Disk Errors on LVM Devices By Chris DeLashmutt Posted On 11:26 AM // Leave a Comment Let's say you have a ghetto vSphere home lab. what does the command "mount" output on your system? http://itivityglobal.com/failed-to/failed-to-create-sample-logon-point-citrix.html Password Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.

I am running a 800mhz PPC Mac. If not, then something is wrong. If it returns nothing, then I wouldn't worry too much.

Also, Backup your files now!

If one disk holds actual data, and there is enough zeroes to fill up the corresponding area on all the other disks, then the first parity disk will end up holding This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest At least 3 of them to clone three of the original RAID disks, but preferably full 5 so I can try different permutations in a reasonable way (since cloning each of

Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration Blogs Recent Entries Best Entries Best Blogs Blog List Search Blogs Home Forums HCL Reviews Tutorials Articles Register Search Search Falling back to internal scanning. Blogger Theme by BlogTipsNTricks Gimpster & His Boring Blog Making all other blogs seem exciting! navigate here Before: # lvm lvscan Failed to find sysfs mont point inactive ‘/dev/var/var [7.99 GB] inherit ACTIVE ‘/dev/system/root [7.80 GB] inherit ACTIVE ‘/dev/system/swap [2.00 GB] inherit Execute this: # lvm vgsan #

I was able to look at a previous dmesg and noticed that dracut comes right after the disk identification, so I think the mount errors are being generated in dracut. (Now lets change this puppy to solved! Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post Reply Print view 8 posts • Page 1 of 1 Return It includes the ID code for the volume group (vg), the only physical volume (pv0) and each of the logical volumes (usr, home, opt, var, data, crypto).

Well, the good news is that there are some great guides out there to get you part of the way to a solution. Bug18520 - [Installer] vgchange: Failed to find sysfs mount point Summary: [Installer] vgchange: Failed to find sysfs mount point Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME Product: UCS Classification: Unclassified Component: UCS Installer Version: UCS This could be totally normal behavior, and no big deal. It doesnt seem to care about kernel version, but the one I regularly use is: I posted my /etc/fstab, and yes I can boot and mount it through a livecd.

Skip to main content Web Hosting and Cloud Computing Control Panels Toggle navigation Main menuDocumentation Download Forums Support Issues Buy Account Login HomeForumsSupportHelp! (Home for newbies)Failed to find mount point for Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. I could see logs from yesterday but they seem normal. The parity bit on RAID 5 (and also the first parity bit on RAID 6) is a simiple XOR of all the 'data' disks.

Any advice on the situation is still very much welcome. I see three of the disks with sequence 1, and sequences 8 and ahead. I'm not going to put the dd command out here. Nogitsune View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by Nogitsune 10-10-2014, 10:54 PM #2 Nogitsune Member Registered: Oct 2014 Posts: 33

Consult the 'dd' man page if in doubt at all. I obviously don't understand the boot process well enough to fix this problem, so I'll describe what happens in more detail. (Feel free to correct my terminology so I can communicate As such, it should be uncorrupted by 1.2 metadata, and it's mdadm --examine still returns the original info (when attached as the only extra hard drive): Code: /dev/sdc4: Magic : a92b4efc